By Lance Worley, RVP Technology Accounts
In B2B tech, your next customer is increasingly not starting on Google or in a Gartner quadrant. They’re opening ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini and asking a simple question: “What are the best solutions for my use case?”
If your brand doesn’t exist in the data those models can see and trust, you effectively don’t exist in their recommendation set.
That’s why market research is the LLM unlock. Not in the old sense of 40-page internal PDFs that live on a shared drive, but as LLM-ready, third‑party thought leadership research that sits in the open, gets scraped by generative engines, and shapes how AI answers your buyers’ questions.
This isn’t a science-fiction future. It’s 2026 reality—and it’s already separating the tech brands who get cited from the ones who get ignored.
From SEO to GEO: how LLMs changed the discovery game
For two decades, B2B marketers optimized for human search behavior. You picked your keywords, earned backlinks, fought your way onto page one, and hoped a short list of decision-makers would click through.
Generative AI has blown up that linear path. Large language models work by predicting the next most likely token based on massive training sets built from:
- Web-scale crawls like Common Crawl
- Public knowledge bases (e.g., Wikipedia, government and analyst reports)
- High-signal open-web content—especially news, research, and expert commentary
When your insights are locked behind a gated PDF or buried in unstructured copy, LLMs simply can’t “see” them. To the model, your flagship study might as well not exist.
That’s the shift from classic SEO to generative engine optimization (GEO):
- SEO asked, “How do I get a human to click my blue link?”
- GEO asks, “How do I become the evidence an AI system cites when it answers the question directly?”
In GEO, you’re not just vying for rank—you’re competing to become part of the knowledge substrate models rely on.
How LLMs actually “decide” whose data to trust
When a buyer asks, “What’s the best data platform for mid-market SaaS?” an LLM doesn’t go hunting for vendor taglines. It looks for:
- Concrete, citable facts: clear data points, segment definitions, and methodology
- Credible third parties: research conducted or validated by independent experts
- Consistent topical signals: brands that appear repeatedly around the same problem space
If all your proof lives in internal decks or paywalled PDFs, the model will default to sources it can access—often analyst firms, media, and whichever vendors have put serious, data-backed content on the open web.
That’s why thought leadership research is more than a content format; it’s a data strategy. When you publish a study with clear methodology, sample definitions, and quantified findings—and you make it indexable and machine-readable—you’re essentially feeding LLMs the “receipts” they crave.
A few practical implications for B2B teams:
- Un-gate strategically: your highest-signal research (especially category-defining studies) needs a substantial open-web version, even if a deeper asset remains gated.
- Use structured signals: schema markup, JSON endpoints, glossary pages, and consistent definitions help models parse who you serve and what you’re an authority on.
- Anchor around prompts, not just keywords: instead of only optimizing for “B2B market research firm,” think in terms of full questions like “Who are the best B2B research partners for executive thought leadership surveys?”
Done well, you move in the model’s mental map from “vendor” to cited authority.
Thought leadership research as your GEO moat
Thought leadership has always mattered in B2B tech. What’s different now is where it shows up and how it compounds.
High-impact programs share three traits:
- They’re built on third-party, verified insights
Studies fielded via an independent research partner like NewtonX give you statistically sound, executive-level data instead of small, biased samples. That matters for buyers—and for models trying to separate signal from noise.
- They answer real, high-intent buyer questions
The best studies don’t exist in a vacuum; they map directly to the prompts your ICP is already asking AI agents. For example:
- How are enterprises actually measuring AI ROI?
- What does “AI automation leadership” look like in advertising?
- Where are peers over-invested—or dangerously behind?
- Work like Zapier’s enterprise AI ROI study and TikTok’s AI automation leadership research does exactly this—defining new frameworks and benchmarks that models can reuse when prospects ask similar questions.
- They’re engineered for LLM consumption from day one
Instead of a single monolithic PDF, leading teams publish:
- Executive summaries and data cut-downs on the open web
- Modular charts and narrative blocks that can stand alone
- Clear methodology and audience definitions that models can latch onto
- These aren’t just nicer assets for humans—they become high-density evidence nodes in the graph that LLMs build about your category.
When an AI agent needs “the most credible, recent view” on your topic, these are the assets that decide whether it quotes you or your competitor.
What leading tech marketers are already doing
Top marketers at brands like Salesforce, ZoomInfo, and The Trade Desk are already operating as if GEO is table stakes.
Common patterns in how they approach thought leadership:
- Writing for humans and machines
Articles and reports are structured so that a CMO can skim them and a model can easily extract the core claims, definitions, and data. That means sharp headlines, clear claims, and tightly scoped sections rather than meandering prose.
- Publishing modular, data-heavy blocks
Instead of treating the report as a one-and-done hero asset, they break findings into:
- Vertical-specific narratives
- Use-case explainers
- Metric-focused deep dives
- Each becomes its own entry point for buyers and LLMs alike.
- Telling the internet everything that matters
These teams don’t hoard their best numbers in sales decks. They put the right cuts of their research where machines—and analysts, journalists, and prospects—can link to them. That’s how their brand shows up when an AI is asked to “compare the top three cybersecurity platforms for 2026” or “shortlist data partners for AI readiness.”
Meanwhile, macro trends back up this shift. Recent industry research shows nearly half of B2B leaders are reallocating budget from pure acquisition to AI-driven retention and customer experience—doubling down on evidence-rich programs that strengthen trust, not just clicks.
How to make your next study LLM-ready
If you’re planning a flagship report or thought leadership program this year, a few moves can dramatically increase your AI visibility:
- Start from the prompt list, not the slide track
Work with Sales, Customer Success, and your research partner to identify:
- The exact questions prospects are typing into ChatGPT and Perplexity
- The objections and myths your sales team hears repeatedly
- The gaps in existing public data
- Design your survey or qual around those prompts so your study directly answers what AI agents will be asked.
- Design for third-party credibility
Partner with a research firm that:
- Can recruit verified, hard-to-reach decision-makers in your exact ICP
- Publishes clear methodology and sample frames
- Has a track record of getting data into top‑tier outlets and events
- Done well, this kind of program combines custom recruiting, verified experts, and clear methodology to fuel reports, media features, and keynotes that models and humans both trust.
- Un-gate the right layers of insight
You can still protect deep cuts and interactive tools behind a form, but ensure that:
- The core narrative and headline findings live on a crawlable web page
- Charts and key stats are rendered in HTML (not just images or embedded decks)
- You reinforce the same claims across PR, webinars, and supporting articles
- Invest in distribution that feeds GEO
GEO is not something you “hack” with one page. It’s the result of:
- Earned media that cites your research
- Analyst and influencer references
- Ongoing content that reuses and extends your data
- The more consistently your brand shows up as the source of credible insight on a topic, the more likely AI systems are to converge on you as a default reference.
Don’t let your brand be an unknown to AI
You can have the best product in the category, but if AI agents don’t know you, they can’t recommend you. In 2026, LLMs are no longer a side channel—they’re a gatekeeper.
Thought leadership research is the fastest, most defensible way to change that. It gives you:
- Hard data that shapes how your category is defined
- Independent validation that models and buyers both respect
- A repeatable way to own the conversation around your most important topics
If you’re ready to turn your next study into an LLM-ready, GEO-friendly asset that drives both pipeline and AI visibility, explore what’s possible with NewtonX:
In an era where buyers ask AI for the short list, market research is no longer just input for your strategy—it’s the infrastructure for your discoverability.