How The Wall Street Journal cut through the generative AI haze with NewtonX insights
Automation for Performance: Global overview and marketer’s guide to AI-powered advertising
Beyond the Deal: Why Brand Migration Makes or Breaks M&A
The AI Frontier: How Digital Twins Are Reshaping Product Marketing
ANA + NewtonX: The Confident B2B Marketer (and how you can be one too)
Most AI is failing. Our new research with TikTok offers a better roadmap
How Coinbase Integrates AI Insights into Its Go-to-Market Strategy
TikTok + NewtonX Quantify AI Automation Leadership in Advertising
Schneider Electric exposes America’s hidden water crisis and calls for smart infrastructure action at Climate Week
Salesforce Releases CIO Study 2026 as CIOs Enter the Era of Scale
Greenbook Selects NewtonX as the B2B Data Provider for the 2025 GRIT Business & Innovation Report
Zapier Partners with NewtonX to Reveal How Enterprises Measure AI ROI
Get the download from Kaan Divitoglu, NewtonX Senior Manager, Client Partnerships:
It happened to Kodak, BlackBerry, and Skype. From being synonymous with their products — in Kodak’s case, for over a century — to a rapid descent into obsolescence.
Could this same fate be in the cards for ChatGPT?
While our NewtonX Prime Generative AI survey shows it’s unlikely in the short term, the future is less clear. And our respondents — 235 executives, analysts, and technology specialists — have ideas about who could steal ChatGPT’s crown.
The name that pops up more than any other is Google.
This should come as no surprise. Google was blazing the AI trail way before ChatGPT took the world by storm. The breadth of Google’s infrastructure also puts it in a much stronger position relative to other competitors.
“…if there is a solution that calls for scale, Google is the best placed to provide it,” argues Stratechery’s Ben Thompson. “[Google] not only has a massive fleet of TPUs [Tensor Processing Units], but has also been developing those TPUs to run in parallel at every level of the stack, from chip to cluster to even data centers.”
That said, Google’s “scale and an overwhelming infrastructure advantage” will only go so far.
Ultimately, the product will have to live up to expectations. And, according to our research, it’s still falling short. 59.3% of respondents see Bard, Google’s generative AI tool, as a follower, not a leader. Net promoter score is also negative: -5 compared to ChatGPT’s 48.
If history has taught us anything, it’s that a lot can change very quickly. But, as things stand, Google still has a lot of work to do to win over hearts and minds.
Share
While appetite for generative AI is on an upward trajectory, the practicalities of adoption are far less clear. That's why investing in custom B2B research could give you the edge over your competitors.
read moreWhen decision-makers are debating which generative AI tools to invest in, it's reliability that tips the scales. But is brand awareness coloring perceptions?
read moreSurveying professionals from Amazon, AMD and Nvidia to better understand the market for the next-gen computer chip.
read more